Franklin Graham is an idiot.
It’s obvious that Michigan is a hotbed of muslim extremism, ISIS or not. A carefully placed nuke over Dearborn would do the country good!
No! Not really. If you agree with them, then you don’t believe in free speech either.
Yep. Moslems. Peaceful, fun-loving people.
In almost every security disclosure list, you’ll usually find one company digging up the dirt on the most recent vulnerabilities: Google. The team, dubbed Project Zero, rips apart software to find and report flaws to the owner. The aim? To make the world a safer place.
And it doesn’t always go well. This year alone, Google disclosed two security flaws in Microsoft’s software, leaving the software giant fuming. The security team gave Microsoft three months to fix the flaw, or face public shaming. Apple’s also been taken to task, with at least three zero-day flaws published ahead of its patching. (The benefit is that companies wake up and fix the flaw sooner rather than later. The obvious risk is that if it’s not fixed, it’s the user’s problem.)
But while Google throws stones at its competitors, it’s neglecting its own glass house full of users to protect.
Android remains the most popular mobile operating system in the world with over 81 percent of the worldwide market share. But only a fraction of Android’s share is running the software’s latest version, with the latest bug fixes, vulnerability patches, and security updates. Official stats say just shy of 10 percent are using Android 5.0 “Lollipop,” with about 39 percent running the second latest version, Android 4.4 “KitKat.”
That’s a huge gap, but not close to even older versions. It’s almost exactly split fifty-fifty down the middle between Android 4.3 and earlier — including some 930 million devices that remain vulnerable to a security flaw Google won’t fix, and Android 4.4 and later.
That’s because not everyone gets the updates. Some Android devices aren’t deemed compatible. That includes updates that include incremental security fixes (and features) known to mitigate malware threats and data leaks.
And it’s not Google that determines who gets an upgrade. Google leaves it up to the carriers.
Carriers argue they need to test Android updates to determine whether or not a device will get an upgrade. When it’s not the carriers, it’s the phone makers. That’s a problem because the software path is far quicker than the hardware path. Most devices will need a number of software updates over the course of their lifetimes, which usually last a year or two.
The problem is that most devices are never updated.
The one exception is Google’s own brand of phones, the Nexus line-up, which remain continually updated with the latest patches and fixes. That includes the long-awaited device encryption the company promised late last year, along with Apple, in an effort to remove itself from the communications chain when the feds knock at its doors for user data.
That’s where Google wins at the expense of the rest of Android’s user base. Google is not at the mercy of the carriers, but does let the carriers walk all over it. As a result, Google’s policy for a Nexus device versus every other device has created an ecosystem of fragmentation that affects the platform’s security.
And that’s entirely on Google’s head. It’s advantageous for the carriers to withhold software updates because they can better tempt users to buy newer devices instead. As for Google’s tempting offer of upgradable Nexus devices, the company can pass itself off as a rival phone maker if it sells more than a few handfuls.
But at the end of the day, it’s the users that get hurt. Android’s reputation resets with the major release cycle while Android’s some billion users are stuck on older versions, running buggy and flawed software that can easily be tampered with and targeted by hackers.
Thursday on Fox News Channel’s “The Five,” co-host Greg Gutfeld discussed President Barack Obama criticizing Christians for speaking out against abortion more than poverty this week at a poverty summit at Georgetown University and declared Obama to be a “karaoke Christian.”
“He possesses the artificial wisdom of an arrogant grad student who came home to supper to lecture his mom and dad over Thanksgiving,” Gutfeld said. “The defining issue, believe it or not, for a lot of Christians, most Christians, is abortion because they’re speaking up for a living being that cannot speak for itself. He’s basically saying shut up already. I’ve said it before, I am not the least bit religious, but at least I stick up for the good work of religion and the cascade of benefits that come from religion. At least I’m honest when I say that I’m not religious, and President Obama should do the same because I know he is not religious. I don’t buy it for a second and I think he is a—he’s a karaoke Christian.”
Libtard pervert. What would you expect from Frisco??
This is exactly why the government is never to be trusted about anything. Government by its very nature is evil no matter what the apostle says.
Republicans are equal opportunity crooks. God help us.
As you know, my dear people, the last year for me has been an annus horribilus.
The Royal House of Clinton has been tormented by questions about our handling of finances and subjected to tiresome questions about the tragic events in Benghazi–in the furthest regions of our empire. And, sadly, also questions about my Royal e-mails.
Nevertheless, I will not be daunted in my desire and commitment to serve you the people. For the next seventeen months I will be traveling among you as one of you, to listen to your deepest longings and needs. I will be with you in your Wal-Mart and beside you in your Burger Kings. I will drive with you down the busy interstate highways of our land sharing your poverty and needs with you.
How well I remember the days when the Duke of Arkansas and I were impoverished. After we were expelled from our Washington Palace we hardly had two mansions to rub together. We were so poor we had to remove thousands of dollars of china, flatware, carpets and gifts from the Washington Palace just to survive.
Now, happily, benefactors from around our empire have given just enough for us to scrape by.
During those difficult times we had to cut back when our daughter was married. We only had three million dollars to spend on her wedding and I remember our hopes as she moved into her $10 million Manhattan apartment that one day she would be able to move on from that humble abode to something more fitting.
So as I travel across our land to meet you all, I will be listening and sharing with you. Then when the time for the royal election comes I know you will crown me as your rightful monarch so that we can all live happily ever after.
Copyright Doug Giles 2015
According to Bill O’Reilly and Juan Williams we shouldn’t have drawing contests that mock Mohammed because that’ll “unnecessarily” get Muslims miffed.
FYI, to O’Reilly and Juan: Most of Islam lives in a 24/7 state of unnecessary rage. They’re more moody than my buddy’s nutty wife who makes a rabid Rottweiler on meth look like Mr. Rogers after seventeen bong hits of Bruce Banner #3.
Look, gents (and you know this), everything we do ticks Islam off. We don’t have to doodle Mohammed cartoons to get them in a full-on hissy fit. They’re there. Like in, already. As in, right now.
For example: I had an applewood, avocado, bibb lettuce, farm fresh tomato, herb aioli on pressed sourdough double-bacon BLT for lunch today served up by a definite non-Muslim girl who looked just like a 22-year-old Britney Spears in a black T-shirt. You think Islam liked that? Uh, no. It’s an ”abomination” to them, worthy of lashings.
Oh … speaking of BritBrit, they are also no-fan of Miss Spears’ cleavage, and it’s not because her two kids from Federline drained the living life out of her mammaries, but principally because she likes to show off her puppies pretty much everywhere she goes; and somehow that’s deemed an “offense” to the men who stare at goats. Go figure.
Another, kooky example of how discombobulated the Religion Of Perpetual Rage is: Iran just banned trendy haircuts because they’re supposedly spawned by “devil worshipers”.
Now granted, I’m sure Josè Eber is no saint. I mean … like … who is? But to call the likes of a hair-stylist, such as Josè, a “devil worshiper” for providing men with a hipster hair-cut, is to, how would one say, skip a few steps.
By the way, if these lovelies think a modicum of pomade makes one an apostate then please … for the love of God … no one forward them pics of Adam Lambert’s new-doo because their heads will explode and we’ll be picking brain tissue and rag particles out of the acoustic tiles in HUD homes for the next decade.
While we’re on the topic of what makes Islam incensed, get a load of this: kids who lip-sync to Pharrell’s “Happy” song, I kid you not, make Muslims muy loco. Yes, a song about being Happy, makes The Religion Of Peace mad as hell and it lead to the arrest of six young Iranians.
So, Bill and Juan, what should we do with the implacable Islamic nutters?
How much do we cave to their crazy, graceless criteria? Where does it end?
If we follow your line of logic and not do cartoons that make Muslims mad, then should I dispense with my BLT? Should Britney stop shopping at Frederick’s of Hollywood? Should Adam abandon getting his faux-hawk moussed to gravity-defying heights? And Should Pharrell scrap his “Happy” tune because that makes Islam so mad they want to spit?
Should we all just roll up in the fetal position and wet our big wussy diaper lest we offend The Religion Of Never-Ending Offense?
My husband is a liar and a cheat. He has cheated on me from the beginning, and when I confront him, he denies everything. What’s worse, everyone knows that he cheats on me. It is so humiliating.
Also, since he lost his job 14 years ago, he hasn’t even looked for a new one. All he does all day is smoke cigars, cruise around and shoot the bull with his buddies, while I have to work to pay the bills.
Since our daughter went away to college he doesn’t even pretend to like me, and even hints that I may be a lesbian.
What should I do?
Grow up and dump him. Good grief woman! You don’t need him anymore! You’re running for President of the United States. Act like one.
Who in the hell gives a rat’s ass about this. Come on people, we fought a war over the royalty. Mostly in-bred scum.
© Lee Culpepper April 30, 2015
We haven’t heard much about the father of Freddie Gray, the 25-year-old man whose mysterious death while in police custody ignited savage race riots and attacks on innocent citizens across Baltimore.
We also haven’t heard much about other Baltimore fathers parenting their children in the midst of the chaos.
Instead, we have seen government agencies trying to police the youth through a show of force while still allowing juvenile delinquents to commit crimes. We see complete strangers trying to talk sense to the kids. We see criminal gangs masquerading as noble citizens and managing the chaos through a well-deserved reputation for vengeance. We have seen a desperate single mother trying to discipline her teenage son, but we haven’t seen fathers.
Where are the fathers? This is the uncomfortable questions liberals refuse to ask.
Sure, the government can manage this chaos to some degree through force and coercion, but fathers can influence order and discipline through love and devotion.
How much of the violence and rebellion in Baltimore is simply a consequence of the destruction of families?
How much has the moral decay of society contributed to the acceptance and tolerance of men who feel no responsibility for children they’ve created?
How much of a child’s rage and anger comes from feeling abandoned or unwanted by their fathers?
Eighty-five percent of the youths in prison are from fatherless homes. Children without fathers account for 63 percent of youth suicides, 70 percent of teenage pregnancies, 80 percent of rapists with displaced anger, 85 percent of children with behavioral problems, and 71 percent of high school dropouts.
The left’s immoral and destructive dogmas coincide with the rise of these deplorable statistics. Addictive and debilitating welfare, the moral relativism of multiculturalism, no-fault divorces, a utterly disastrous urban school system, and government intrusion into parenting practices have done nothing — but eliminate personal responsibility and accountability from society.
It is common knowledge now that 72 percent of black children grow up in homes without a father. Less than 60 years ago, 78 percent of black families were in tact with a father and mother at home.
Furthermore, despite the incredibly low graduation standards public schools have today, nearly 50 percent of black males now drop out of school. Of course, black children are not alone in the disaster liberals have created by replacing a father’s work, love, and discipline with government entitlements, liberal psychobabble, and a victim mentality.
Self-destructive behavior is far too common among youths without dads dedicated to their lives. Occasionally, a handful of fatherless young people overcome the steep odds. But the vast majority of fatherless children simply proliferate the cycle of dysfunctional youths with half-siblings who have no relationships with their fathers, either.
Statistics about absent fathers reveal plenty concerning the mayhem the media shamelessly avoids. On the other hand, personal experience often reveals more than numbers. My work as a teacher and a coach has made me more familiar with the effects of fatherless children than I often wish I were. But ignoring the ugly reality doesn’t change the painful truth.
Who is teaching us that the government can replace fathers by providing for children through welfare, food stamps, and detention centers disguised as urban schools? So long as unmarried moms remain unmarried, the government will supply them with addictive handouts.
Are Christian values teaching this message? Are white conservative males responsible? Is America’s tradition of self-reliance, independence, and limited government to blame?
At Freddie Gray’s funeral, Reverend Jamal H. Bryant blamed Freddie’s death on being “man enough to look someone of authority in the eye.” The reverend claims to believe that the police “figured [Freddie Gray] was a threat” because “they are used to black men with their head held down low. And “their spirit broken.”
As paranoid and delusional as the reverend’s imagination should sound to any person no longer mentally stuck in the 1960s, liberals cannot deny that Rev. Bryant’s message is great fatherly advice for liberal derelicts who do not want to accept responsibility for their own self-destructive values and bad behavior.
Freddie Gray had a tough life, no doubt. However, no one forced him to become a serial criminal at the age of 18. Liberal agendas, not cops, rob kids like Freddie of the opportunity to have devoted fathers and to receive meaningful educations.
The Washington Post reported that Freddie was four grade levels behind in reading when he was 17 years old. This is not uncommon for children stuck in inner-city schools. No student can learn in classrooms where normal students are confined with kids who become derelicts and hoodlums and have no father committed to their lives.
Then again, why should America worry about fatherless kids destroying their own city? Liberals and the government will provide for them. Liberals just need more money to give the children what they need.
As for Freddie Gray, who has time to talk about his father and the value of traditional families? There’s too much looting to be done in Baltimore. The kids there are just taking what liberals have taught them they need.
• March 13, 2015: Malicious destruction of property, second-degree assault
• January 20, 2015: Fourth-degree burglary, trespassing
• January 14, 2015: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute
• December 31, 2014: Possession of narcotics with intent to distribute
• December 14, 2014: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance
• August 31, 2014: Illegal gambling, trespassing
• January 25, 2014: Possession of marijuana
• September 28, 2013: Distribution of narcotics, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, second-degree assault, second-degree escape
• April 13, 2012: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, violation of probation
• July 16, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession with intent to distribute
• March 28, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
• March 14, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to manufacture and distribute
• February 11, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance
• August 29, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, violation of probation
• August 28, 2007: Possession of marijuana
• August 23, 2007: False statement to a peace officer, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
• July 16, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance (2 counts)
A friend just called and said that he went to the CVS pharmacy in Baltimore … … he said all that was left was suntan lotion and Father’s Day cards!!!!!
My neighbor came over the other day and she asked if I’d be her jogging partner. I told her I would first have to check with my cardiologist. Well, he nixed the idea. So, I gave her your cell number, so you can expect a call in the next day or two. You might want to check with YOUR doctor before you make a decision … You know I’m just saying!